Comments on: Badvocacy, Dilbert style http://allaboutadvocacy.com/2008/06/16/badvocacy-dilbert-style/ Fri, 18 May 2012 07:58:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: Leslie Gaines-Ross http://allaboutadvocacy.com/2008/06/16/badvocacy-dilbert-style/#comment-10043 Leslie Gaines-Ross Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:17:40 +0000 http://allaboutadvocacy.com/2008/06/16/badvocacy-dilbert-style/#comment-10043 Thanks for that piece of information re Google. That is a cool stat. Will definitely use it...25 billion times. What a large number. Glad you enjoyed the presentation and thanks for the comment. lgr Thanks for that piece of information re Google. That is a cool stat. Will definitely use it…25 billion times. What a large number.

Glad you enjoyed the presentation and thanks for the comment. lgr

]]> By: Yeelim http://allaboutadvocacy.com/2008/06/16/badvocacy-dilbert-style/#comment-8442 Yeelim Wed, 02 Jul 2008 06:49:49 +0000 http://allaboutadvocacy.com/2008/06/16/badvocacy-dilbert-style/#comment-8442 Hi Tim, I recently saw Leslie's presentation about reputation management and found it very interesting. Today I heard a quote that went: 'People see Google as an information retrieval system, it is so much more. It is a reputation engine' used about 25billion times a year' If this is the case, does the entire logic of traditional reputation management change?! Hi Tim,

I recently saw Leslie’s presentation about reputation management and found it very interesting.

Today I heard a quote that went:

‘People see Google as an information retrieval system, it is so much more. It is a reputation engine’ used about 25billion times a year’

If this is the case, does the entire logic of traditional reputation management change?!

]]>